Does it actually have to be an obligatory duty for anyone to be present at a trial before they are able to have an opinion? The Free Patricia Rorrer page points to a sliver of a fingernail found at the murder site that didnt come from either Patricia or Joann. An infant was lying face down on her stomach. Pat had a string of bad relationships in her past and was not happy. Startling new allegations surround one of Lehigh County's most notorious murder cases. Meticulous primping. Puny policy. Patricia Rorrer is as guilty as sin, and she needs to stay right where shes at. . Patricia Rorrer was tried and convicted of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of kidnapping in March 1998, in Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, for the murder of Joanne Katrinak and her infant son. Her diary certainly indicates some disturbed thinking. The victims vanished on December 15. Patricia made daily phone calls every day but made no calls at all the day before, of and after Joannes murder as she was traveling and knew her phone could track her location. There is pendency of DNA investigation for Routier. There appears to be evidence of her disturbed thinking shortly prior to the event (inc her stating she knows who the perp was shortly after but would not identify because its her?) Then 31 years old, she had lived a rocky existence. Shes attracted the help of writer Tammy Mal (full name Tammy Malinowski OReilly), author of Convenient Suspect, a book about the case. Were suppose to ignore the actual forensic evidence and forensic opinions because we were told that a cop overheard her claiming she confessed? Oh wait, sorry, you werent there. Ive found that in nearly every case, those who are firmly of the opinion shes guilty have an extremely limited knowledge of the case theyve watched one (or perhaps more) of the documentaries which make absolutely no attempt to show anything thats in Rorrers favour (theres plenty, if one bothers to look), and worse, revel in exaggerated and speculative scenes, some of which were never even mentioned at her trial. She hasnt, she didnt get a hard enough sentence. Wrong Man Season 2 Review: Joe Berlinger's Dream Team Tries Changing According to court papers from Patricia 2017 appeal, DNA on the cigarette butt found near the two bodies belonged to Appellant. (Prosecutor Michael McIntyre, however, told ForensicFilesNow.com that that the cigarette butt was never actually tested). His defenders claimed that the confession was coerced, the video was grainy/unclear or doctored and the witness was confused and/or unreliable. And yikes, he discovered someone had cut one of the houses phone lines and pried the hinge on the basement door. As for the murder weapon, police didnt find a .22 caliber pistol on Patricias property, but an ex-boyfriend claimed that she owned one and it would always jam after one shot. Finally, another irony you fail to appreciate: you claim theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. None. WoW! At the states request, the instructor wore a wire during a phone conversation with Patricia. Tragedy also touched Patricias life. It showed her usually all-brown hair haphazardly highlighted blond. State police and the Philadelphia division of the FBI appealed to the public for leads. Highly charged case. 6-10. Patricia Rorrer was a cold woman. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. Psycho For Love: Patricia Rorrer killed her ex-boyfriend's new wife Any subsequent proof emerging and then revealed in a book or documentary is surely something that should be taken seriously and investigated if necessary. So whats your point (other than many people are stupid and you arent)? Im sure shes innocent adds nothing other than to tell us your state of mind! She would also have no heart when it comes to children, not even her own. The FBI even included a written report to that effect. Stable situation. Patricia, who moved from PA to North Carolina, made long distance calls from her home practically every day, except for the time period between December 11 and 16. This video is currently unavailable. We should be skeptical of those, like you, who suggest its obvious a jury got it wrong that you know better than 12 people presented with the evidence. Your assertion that most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense is in fact nonsense the reality is that most people are easily fooled by these biased documentaries who then feel its okay to spout their tripe as if its the gospel. I dont think she was ever scared until we put the cuffs on her.. This woman was motivated by an obsession with a man who no longer wanted her. Shame on your for defending a vicious killer. I therefore, perhaps naively, default to the judicial systems eventually getting the decision right. No explanation given. Why would it be an irony for a person to express his opinion? Inside the locked 1992 vehicle, police discovered some strands of blond hair stained with dried blood. Its definitely getting rougher every day, Andrew told the Morning Call. Her alibi about going to the club, called Cowboys Nitelife, got fuzzy when investigators discovered she hadnt signed the guest book on that day. I deduced my opinion to be fact because of what Ive read and seen and is supported by evidence which was never disclosed at her trial. RR, Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube. How about the two eyewitnesses that identified her alive days after her disappearance. The evidence was all there. On a secret recording, Patricia asked Jarrett to vouch for her attendance or she might go to the electric char. I think shes guilty for sure. Ive scanned through of all my remarks on this site and nowhere have a seen a single remark that confirms your assertion that Ive been insulting. Jealousy was the motive. Plus, he had only a minimal life insurance policy on Joann and he passed polygraphs, according to The FBI Files: Family Secrets. I would suggest you take the time to read the book or, at least watch the documentaries which STICK TO THE FACTS, and then comment. Mal told Keith Morrison that Patricias dance teacher originally confirmed her alibi that she was in class on the day of the murder, then changed his mind. It says that Andrew Katrinak passed his lie detector test. That documentary points out that, despite the bodies of the two victims supposedly being exposed for several months, their condition remained relatively undisturbed by weather or animal activity. Theres speculation and theres lies period. After reading this forum and hearing the details of this case, Iowa sure seems a lot fairer in my eyes. Ex-boyfriend Walter Blalock said that Patricia wanted him to be more like Andrew. ALL IT THEN BECOMES IS A SOURCE OF INACCURACIES AND SPECULATION, WHICH ONLY SERVES TO BOLSTER THOSE WITH THAT MENTALITY AND PERPETUATE THE LACK OF TRUTH. Its not logical to say we know the truth unless we seen it for ourselves. The series was produced by Joe Berlinger, who made the Paradise Lost documentaries, which garnered actor Johnny Depps attention and ultimately helped free the West Memphis Three. There was also forensic evidence, obviously planted by them crooked cops, according to defenders. The person who killed Joann is currently serving a life sentence because 10 months after Joann and Alex died, he killed another woman (who bore a striking resemblance to Joann) and her baby. But her reputation wasnt exactly sleek and shiny. This is untrue. Patricias accusers theorized that she resented Joanns domestic bliss with the tall, athletic Andrew Katrinak. He had worked as a semi-pro boxer in Las Vegas in his youth and later settled into his own construction business. Patricia Rorrer: An Update - Forensic Files Now For this week, I looked into the defenders reasoning as well as Patricias whereabouts today. My biggest issue is the day the phone call came in, and the fact that the prosecutor deliberately misrepresented the facts. Update/Clean-Up. You ought to acquaint yourself thoroughly with the case and not allow yourself to get any further elevated on your high horse. I was able to email with Patricia via the PrisonConnect platform around Christmastime. Unfortunately for Joanne this psycho took it badly. Despite the new evidence and hypotheses, the courts have rejected all of Patricias bids for a new trial. Joanne and Alex didnt disappear until 12/15. I attack only those whove considered themselves not only judges on this case, but go on to vent their spleen aimed at a person who in my opinion is innocent of this crime, based on all Ive read and watched without fear of retaliation If they so freely attack someone in the most vicious way, why should they be off limits? What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. Very soon after, the original hairs (in glass slides) were sent to the FBI again. Patricia Rorrer will burn in hell, as she should. Rest in peace Joann and Alex. For more on the Katrinak murder case, you can watch Autopsy Six: A Fatal Attraction for free on YouTube. Despite the fact it has never been proved thats exactly how it happened, it seems to be accepted as fact it could just as possibly have been the other way round, beaten and then shot. But let me say in my defence, I have not attacked anyone on this particular site with outright rudeness, to which you allude, albeit some of them deserved a retort of some substance. They theorize that Andrew Katrinak framed Patricia and that the hostile phone call between Patricia and Joann actually took place not on Dec. 12 as Andrew said but rather on Dec. 7. As for Joanns parents, her father died a year after the murder. Clifford: I cant offer anything remotely novel or incisive. Not gender neutral. They allege that the North Carolina resident stealthily drove 500 miles to Pennsylvania and killed out of a sense of deadly indignation. One on one? Dial-a-problem. she didnt need to . There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. Maybe then you will see the wrongful conviction! Patricia also pointed out that when author Tammy Mal started her research and speaking to me, she was not an advocate at all but she reversed and ended up advocating for Patricias innocence. Why bother with this site, which isnt for professional criminalists/forensic scientists, if youre going to get so tetchy and rude? Mr Freeman, Why are youre rude about others who disagree with your OPINION (including jury and appeal judges)? Lehigh County Deputies escort accused murderer Patricia Rorrer, as she arrives for the beginning of her trial at the Lehigh County Courthouse in Allentown, on Friday, Feb. 6, 1998. Conflicting versions. Ms. How do you explain her not telling the truth to the authorities about the gun and its flaw of only able to shoot once and then jamming up. Does it actually have to be an obligatory duty for anyone to be present at a trial before they are able to have an opinion? Thats my life.. Or did they? Still, no good leads materialized. Cops under pressure will lie to close a case. They are a joke. Youre clutching at straws Im afraid. I have to assume its because her conviction is regarded as safe (which doesnt mean it IS safe, I know). Lehigh Cty.) which makes a complete nonsense of their gun theory. The Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Networks website also points to a bombshell: In 2015, the Justice Department acknowledged that most of the team members from an FBI microscopic hair comparison unit gave prosecutors flawed data from 1980 to 2000 that could have unjustly contributed to a number convictions including Patricia Rorrers.
Mnl48 Brei Issue,
Texas Volleyball Head Coach Salary,
Deaths In Shabbona, Illinois,
Libra Sun, Moon And Rising,
Articles P